Neurocosmetics 101: Understanding the Skin–Brain Connection

On this page

• The Skin as a Sensory Interface
• Stress Signaling and the Cutaneous HPA Axis
• Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides in Skin Function
  • What This means for Formulation and Testing
• How Neurocosmetic Actives Interact with the Skin
  • Sensory Experience as a Biological Signal 
  • Evaluating Neurocosmetic Performance
• A Broader View of Skin Health 
  • Turning Neurobiology into Formulation Strategy

The basis of skincare has always been visible results; however, what defines a product’s success happens before those changes are seen. How a formula feels on the skin, how it soothes or stimulates, how it fits into moments of stress or rest – these experiences shift how efficacy is perceived and remembered. 

Behind this change is a growing recognition that the skin and the nervous system are deeply interconnected. Far from being a passive outer layer, the skin continuously senses and responds to internal and external stimuli. This biological dialogue, often referred to as the skin-brain axis, is the foundation of neurocosmetics. 

Neurocosmetics don’t aim to alter mood or cognition directly. Instead, they work within the skin’s own neurobiological networks, influencing stress responses, inflammation, and sensory perception in ways that support both skin function and overall comfort [1]. Understanding this connection offers a new lens through which to think about formulation, performance, and experience.

The Skin as a Sensory Interface

The skin is the human body’s largest organ, equipped with an extensive network of nerve endings and receptors. It detects mechanical pressure, temperature changes, chemical irritation, and pain, translating these stimuli into signals that travel to the central nervous system. These pathways allow the body to react quickly to environmental changes, but they also shape longer-term biological responses. 

What makes this system particularly relevant to cosmetic science is that many of these sensory mechanisms are not confined to neurons. Skin cells themselves express functional receptors and produce signaling molecules typically associated with the nervous and endocrine systems. This allows the skin to process stress locally, adjusting inflammatory responses, barrier function, and cellular behaviour without relying solely on signals from the brain [1,2,3]. 

Knowing this, cosmetics can then interact not only with the skin’s structure, but with its sensory intelligence. 

Stress Signaling and the Cutaneous HPA Axis

Stress exerts a profound influence on skin physiology, largely through activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In response to stress, the brain releases corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), setting off a cascade that results in the production of cortisol. While cortisol is essential for short-term adaptation, prolonged elevation is associated with impaired barrier recovery, increased inflammation, and delayed healing [4,5]. 

Crucially, the skin mirrors this system on a local level. Research has shown that keratinocytes can produce CRH, ACTH, cortisol, and their receptors, forming a peripheral HPA-like axis that operates independently of the central nervous system [5,6]. This allows the skin to respond directly to environmental and psychological stressors.

Under normal conditions, cortisol follows a circadian rhythm. However, long term stress can lead to sustained cortisol exposure in the skin, which can compromise barrier integrity and amplify sensitivity [4,5]. These mechanisms help explain why stress often manifests visibly and sensorially at the skin level.

Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides in Skin Function

Beyond cortisol, the skin produces and responds to a range of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, including serotonin and dopamine. These molecules influence inflammation, cell differentiation, pigmentation, and sensory perception. 

Stress-related signaling can increase the release of neurotrophins such as nerve growth factor (NGF), which enhances neural sensitivity and inflammatory responses in the skin [6]. While acute activation of these pathways can be adaptive, chronic stimulation is often linked to persistent sensitivity, redness, and discomfort. 

This dynamic has become central to neurocosmetic research. By influencing how these signaling pathways are activated or regulated, ingredients can support a more balanced skin response, addressing not only visible symptoms but also how the skin experiences its environment [6]. 

What This Means for Formulation and Testing

For R&D teams, neurocosmetic pathways highlight the importance of evaluating ingredients not only for visible outcomes, but for their influence on stress signaling, inflammatory modulation, and sensory perception. Incorporating biomarkers, barrier metrics, and structured sensory evaluation into development and validation workflows can help translate neurobiological insights into substantiated, compliant product claims.

How Neurocosmetic Actives Interact with the Skin

Neurocosmetic ingredients are best understood through the pathways they engage rather than the sensations they promise. One important group of targets includes transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, such as TRPV1, which are involved in heat and irritation perception. Overactivation of these receptors is associated with burning and stinging sensations. However, modulating their activity can help reduce discomfort and neurogenic inflammation. 

Peptides also play a growing role. Some influence neuromuscular signaling, while others interact with pathways involved in inflammation or endorphin release. These mechanisms allow peptides to contribute to both functional and sensory outcomes [7,8]. Botanical extracts and bioactives that support stress pathway balance, including local cortisol regulation, further expand the possibilities. Their effects may not always be immediately visible, but they influence the conditions under which the skin maintains resilience and comfort.

Sensory Experience as a Biological Signal 

Texture, application, and fragrance are often described as experiential elements but they also have biological relevance. Mechanical stimulations during application activates mechanoreceptors. Cooling or warming sensations engage thermoreceptors. Fragrance compounds stimulate olfactory pathways that are closely linked to memory and emotional processing, while also interacting with skin receptors [6]. 

These interactions help explain why sensory properties can influence perceived efficacy and long-term product acceptance. Sensory design, in this sense, becomes part of the skin's biological response rather than a purely aesthetic choice.

Evaluating Neurocosmetic Performance

As formulators increasingly engage neurobiological pathways, evaluation methods are evolving. Traditional visual assessments are complemented by measures of barrier recovery, inflammatory markers, and sensory perception. 

Metrics such as transepidermal water loss, cytokine expression, and validated sensory panels help capture effects that are meaningful but not always immediately visible. Importantly, neurocosmetic claims remain focused on local skin biology rather than systemic neurological effects, maintaining clear boundaries within cosmetic regulation.

A Broader View of Skin Health 

Neurocosmetics reflect a shift in how skin biology is understood and, increasingly, how products are developed. Stress exposure, sensory perception, and emotional states are not peripheral influences but measurable factors that shape inflammation, barrier integrity, and sensitivity at the skin level.

For cosmetic R&D teams, this reframing has practical implications. It influences how ingredients are screened, how efficacy is evaluated beyond visual endpoints, and how sensory properties are intentionally designed rather than treated as secondary considerations. The skin–brain axis provides a biologically grounded framework for addressing concerns such as sensitivity, stress-exacerbated conditions, and long-term comfort without overstating claims.

Rather than replacing traditional actives, neurocosmetic approaches add another layer to formulation strategy. By acknowledging the skin as both a physical and sensory organ, R&D teams can design products that support resilience, calm, and recovery alongside established efficacy goals. As research continues to mature, the most impactful innovations will likely come from formulations that integrate sensory biology with robust skin science.

Turning Neurobiology into Formulation Strategy

For R&D teams, understanding the skin–brain axis is no longer theoretical. It directly informs how ingredients are selected, how sensory claims are substantiated, and how stress-related skin responses are addressed within regulatory boundaries.

Covalo’s Neurocosmetics campaign brings together ingredient data, mechanistic insights, and emerging formulation strategies to help R&D teams evaluate neurocosmetic actives with scientific confidence.

Explore neurocosmetic ingredients, research-backed pathways, and formulation insights on Covalo! 

References

1. Haykal, D. et al. Beyond beauty: Neurocosmetics, the skin-brain axis, and the future of emotionally intelligent skincare. Clinics in Dermatology. 2025. 43(4); 523-527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2025.05.002
2. Tan, et al. The brain-skin connection: A narrative review of neuroendocrine and immune pathways. JAAD International. 2026. 24, 112-132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2025.10.008
3. Chen Y, Lyga J. Brain-skin connection: stress, inflammation and skin aging. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2014;13(3):177-90. doi: 10.2174/1871528113666140522104422.
4. Smith, S. M., & Vale, W. W.. The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2006; 8(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/ssmith
5. Bobok N, Taskesen T. Stress-Induced Changes of the Skin: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2025 Nov 7;17(11):e96285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.96285.
6. Kim JE, Cho BK, Cho DH, Park HJ. Expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in common skin diseases: evidence of its association with stress-related disease activity. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013 Jul 6;93(4):387-93. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1557.
7. Rizzi V, Gubitosa J, Fini P, Cosma P. Neurocosmetics in Skincare—The Fascinating World of Skin–Brain Connection: A Review to Explore Ingredients, Commercial Products for Skin Aging, and Cosmetic Regulation. Cosmetics. 2021; 8(3):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8030066 
8. Sánchez-Peña MJ, Magallón-Chávez O, Rivas-Loaiza JA. Neurocosmetics and Aromatherapy Through Neurocutaneous Receptors and Their Functional Implications in Cosmetics. Cosmetics. 2025; 12(5):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics12050179