How Innovation Teams Validate Neurocosmetic Claims with Data: Insights from Covalo

On This Page

• Neurocosmetic Claims Demand Data-Driven Validation

• Building a Multi-Layered Validation Framework

• Regulatory considerations

• From Validation to Strategic Advantage

Neurocosmetic Claims Demand Data-Driven Validation 

As the neurocosmetic market grows, brands are now focusing on products that modulate stress responses, enhance comfort, and influence how skin feels. Previously we explored how consumers now consider their skincare routines a peaceful moment, allowing them to relax. But for innovation teams this raises a critical question: how can claims be substantiated when you’re linking ingredients with sensory perception? Unlike conventional endpoints such as hydration or wrinkle reduction, these effects are multi-dimensional and subjection, requiring multi-layered data.

For example, some of the challenges innovation teams might face include:

• Sensory effects may be rapid, while biological effects evolve over time
• Stress-related responses vary significantly between individuals
• Claims often sit at the intersection of cosmetic and wellness language.

Scroll down and learn how neurocosmetic product development brings in real evidence toward their claims.

Building a Multi-Layered Validation Framework 

Successful innovation teams approach neurocosmetic validation as a stack, rather than a single study. Each layer answers a different question and reinforces the credibility of the claim.

Start with precise claim definitions. Here, the more specific the claim – e.g., “brings a sense of comfort for skin affected by environmental stress” – the easier it is to align studies and endpoints. After this step is defined, leverage multi-modal data. Typically, the strongest claims are backed by:

1. Mechanistic and in vitro data

This layer establishes biological plausibility. For neurocosmetics, this often includes assessing how active molecules may modulate neuropeptides or local signaling in skin cells without systemic effects¹.

This step usually involves:

• In vitro assays on keratinocytes or sensory neuron co-cultures
• Biomarker assessment
• Cutaneous neuroreceptor interaction studies

2. Reconstructed skin and ex vivo testing 

In this step, 3D skin models and ex vivo assays serve as intermediate systems that represent real tissue architecture. Protocols that simulate irritation, oxidative stress or barrier disruption help show how ingredients perform in controlled yet clinically relevant environments. Clinical CROs now offer integrated psychophysiological testing that couples in-vitro stress testing with in-vivo performance².

This helps bridge the gap between molecular mechanisms and skin-level outcomes relevant to product performance.

3. Controlled clinical validation 

Clinical studies provide real-world evidence that an ingredient or product performs as claimed. For neurocosmetics this often includes:

• Instrumental endpoints
• Objective sensory endpoints
• Clinical protocols with stress models

Regulatory guidance emphasizes that controlled clinical studies with trained assessors and objective metrics deliver substantiated evidence for claims such as calming or comfort enhancement³.

4. Sensory perception and psychometric assessment 

Sensory evaluation is now conducted with standardized panels, time-to-effect measures, and statistical analysis to quantify perceived benefits. These outcomes often align with instrumental measures to triangulate perception with biology⁴.

Sensory data is especially important in neurocosmetics because feeling better is part of the claim. When sensory profiles correlate with measurable skin responses, they reinforce credibility⁵.

• 💡 Covalo tip: If you want R&D teams to find your innovative ingredients you should cross-reference with industry trends. Tracking search and formulation queries can reveal what claims and endpoints R&D peers are prioritizing, helping tailor your validation strategy. With Covalo’s exclusive data, you can continuously monitor the search trends relating to your desired query.

Regulatory considerations

Across major markets, regulatory frameworks treat neurocosmetics as cosmetics with defined limits⁶. Claims must remain within cosmetic boundaries and avoid medicinal language. In the EU, claims about sensation or comfort are allowed when supported with relevant data. In the US, broader cosmetic language is allowed but neurosensory claims still require substantiation against cosmetic evidence standards, not medical ones.

From Validation to Strategic Advantage

Neurocosmetics are uniquely positioned at the intersection of dermatology, sensory science, and emotional wellbeing. As innovation evolved from visual outcomes to how skin feels, validation must reflect the complexity of the biology it seeks to support.

For R&D teams, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. Neurocosmetic claims invite a more integrated way of working. When the layers of evidence framework align, claims move beyond marketing narratives and become credible signals of formulation intelligence. Crucially, the future of neurocosmetics will be shaped by those who treat data as a design tool, not just a regulatory hurdle. In a category where trust is built on what skin perceives as much as what instruments measure, rigor becomes the differentiator.

Want to align your neurocosmetic formulations with strong scientific validation? Explore data-backed neurocosmetic ingredients on Covalo

References

1. Rizzi, Vito, et al. “Neurocosmetics in Skincare—the Fascinating World of Skin–Brain Connection: A Review to Explore Ingredients, Commercial Products for Skin Aging, and Cosmetic Regulation.” Cosmetics, vol. 8, no. 3, 16 July 2021, p. 66, www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/8/3/66, https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8030066.

2. Freiherr, Jessica. “Investigation of Psychophysiological and Dermatological Effects.” Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, 2025, www.ivv.fraunhofer.de/en/product-performance/personal-home-care/investigation-psychophysiological-claims. Accessed 9 Feb. 2026.

3. Cosmetics Europe. GUIDELINES for COSMETIC PRODUCT CLAIM SUBSTANTIATION. 22 May 2019.https://cosmeticseurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Guidelines_for_Cosmetic_Product_Claim_Substantiation.pdf

4. Roso, Alicia, et al. “Contribution of Cosmetic Ingredients and Skin Care Textures to Emotions.” International Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 42, no. 2, 24 Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12928.

5. Innova, Goya. “Neurocosmetics - the New Frontier of Beauty Well-Being  – Cosmetics Testing News.” Cosmetics Testing News, 18 Nov. 2025, news.skinobs.com/en/neurocosmetics-the-new-frontier-of-beauty-well-being/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.

Ivy Y., Cecilia. “New Rising Trend - Neurocosmetics.” LinkedIn, 24 Oct. 2025, www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-rising-trend-neurocosmetics-cecilia-ivy-yu-bvjbc/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.